Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 45
Filter
1.
Rev. ADM ; 80(4): 190-196, jul.-ago. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1525858

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la adaptación marginal e interna de nuestras restauraciones fabricadas por fundición sistemas de fresado y sinterización láser es uno de los factores clínicos más importantes para el éxito de las prótesis fijas, previniendo el riesgo de microfiltración y enfermedad periodontal. Objetivo: evaluar la adaptación marginal e interna de cofias metálicas en aleación Cr-Co confeccionadas por técnicas convencionales, CAD/ CAM de fresado y sinterizado por láser. Material y métodos: estudio de tipo experimental, comparativo e in vitro. Se imprimió un modelo maestro en Cr-Co, proveniente del escaneo de un premolar preparado para corona completa, sobre el cual se diseñaron 30 cofias divididas en tres grupos: el primero que corresponde al grupo cofias fundidas fresadas en disco de cera A (A = 10), el segundo grupo cofias fresadas en disco de metal presinterizado B (B = 10) y el tercer grupo cofias impresas por sinterización láser C (C = 10). Se empleó la réplica de silicona, colocando silicona al interior de cada cofia, sobre el modelo maestro, simulando al cemento, mediante una máquina de ensayo universal se realizó una compresión de 50 N. Luego de retirar cada cofia se rellenaron con silicona pesada de adición, obteniendo una réplica de silicona. Se efectuaron dos cortes transversales en sentido vestíbulolingual y mesiodistal. Se observó el espesor de silicona VPS (vinil poliéter silicona) mediante un estereomicroscopio (Nikon SMZ745T), obteniendo valores en micrómetros. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizó el software SPSS 25 con el fin de realizar la prueba de normalidad y ANOVA de dos vías bajo un nivel de confianza del 95%. Resultados: el menor gap lo obtuvo el grupo de fresadas, seguido de las impresas y por último las fundidas por métodos convencionales. ANOVA de dos vías reveló diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los tres grupos (p < 0.0001). Conclusiones: se encontró que el gap varía con cada método de fabricación, la técnica convencional de fundido mostró un mayor gap, ninguna excediendo el rango clínicamente aceptable (AU)


Introduction: the marginal and internal adaptation of our restorations manufactured by casting, milling systems and laser sintering is one of the most important clinical factors for the success of fixed prostheses, preventing the risk of microleakage and periodontal disease. Objective: evaluate the marginal and internal adaptation of metal copings in Cr-Co alloy made by conventional techniques, CAD/CAM milling and laser sintering. Material and methods: an experimental, comparative and in vitro study, a Cr-Co master model was printed from the scan of a premolar prepared for a full crown. An experimental, comparative and in vitro study, a Cr-Co master model was printed from the scan of a premolar prepared for a full crown, on which 30 caps divided into three groups were designed; the first group corresponds to the cast copings milled on a wax disc A (A = 10), the second group milled copings on a presintered metal disc B (B = 10) and the third group printed by laser sintering copings C (C = 10). The silicone replica was used, placing silicone inside each coping, on the master model, simulating cement, using a universal testing machine, a 50 N compression was performed. After removing each coping, they were filled with heavy addition silicone, obtaining a silicone replica. Two cross-sections were made in the buccolingual and mesiodistal direction., observing the thickness of the VPS (vinyl polyeter silicone) silicone using a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ745T), obtaining values in micrometers. For the statistical analysis, the SPSS 25 software was used in order to perform the normality and two-way ANOVA tests under a 95% confidence level. Results: the smallest gap was obtained by the milled group, followed by the printed ones and finally those cast by conventional methods. Two-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences between the three groups (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: the gap was found to vary with each fabrication method, the conventional casting technique showed a larger gap, none exceeding the clinically acceptable range (AU)


Subject(s)
Chromium Alloys , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Crowns , Lasers , In Vitro Techniques , Analysis of Variance
2.
Braz. dent. sci ; 26(3): 1-12, 2023. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1511733

ABSTRACT

Objective:This study evaluated the effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate overlays with three different types of resin-luting agents: preheated composite, dual-cure adhesive resin, and flowable composite. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight maxillary first premolars of similar size were prepared with a butt joint preparation design. The teeth were separated into two primary groups, each with twenty-four teeth: Group DDS: Delay dentin sealing (non-IDS) teeth were not treated. Group IDS: dentin sealing was applied immediately after teeth preparation. Each group was subsequently separated into three separate subgroups. Subgroups (DDS+Phc, IDS+Phc): cemented with preheated composite (Enamel plus HRi, Micerium, Italy), Subgroups (DDS+Dcrs, IDS+Dcrs): cemented with dual-cured resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE, Germany) and Subgroups (DDS+Fc, IDS+Fc): Cemented with flowable composite (Filtek supreme flowable, 3M ESPE, USA). Using a digital microscope with a magnification of 230x, the marginal gap was measured before and after cementation at four different locations from each surface of the tooth, and the mean of measurements was calculated and analyzed statistically using the independent t-test, one-way ANOVA test, Bonferroni correction at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The samples that were immediately sealed with dentin bonding agent showed lower marginal gaps than delayed dentin sealing, both pre-and post-cementation for all subgroups, with a statistically significant difference (p˂0.01). The marginal gap was significantly lower in the IDS+Fc (48.888 ±5.5 µm) followed by the IDS+Dcrs group (53.612 ±5.8 µm) and IDS+Phc (79.19 9±6.9 µm) respectively, while the largest marginal gaps were observed in the DDS+Phc group (86.505 ±5.4 µm). Conclusion: Generally, the teeth with IDS showed better marginal adaptation than teeth without IDS. The marginal gap was smaller with flowable composite and dual-cure resin cement than with preheated composite (AU)


Objetivo:Esse estudo avaliou o efeito do selamento imediato da dentina na adaptação marginal de overlays em dissilicato de lítio com três tipos diferentes de agentes de cimentação resinosos: resina composta pré-aquecida, adesivo resinoso dual e resina fluida. Materiais e métodos: Quarenta e oito primeiros pré-molares maxilares com tamanho similar foram preparados com término em ombro. O dente foi separado em dois grupos primários, cada um com vinte e quatro dentes: Grupo DDS: retardado selamento da dentina (non-IDS) dente não foi tratado. Grupo IDS: selamento dentinário foi aplicado imediatamente após a preparação do dente. Cada grupo foi separado de modo subsequente em três subgrupos. Subgrupo (DDS+Phc, IDS+Phc): cimentado com resina pré-aquecida (Enamel plus HRi, Micerium, Italy), Subgrupo (DDS+Dcrs, IDS+Dcrs): cimentado com cimento resinoso dual (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE, Germany) e Subgrupo (DDS+Fc, IDS+Fc): cimentado com resina fluida (Filtek supreme flowable, 3M ESPE, USA). Usando um microscópio digital com magnificação de 230x, o gap marginal foi medido antes e após a cimentação em quatro diferentes localizações de cada superfície do dente e a média das medidas foi calculada e estatisticamente analisada através do uso do teste ANOVA um-fator e teste independente de Tukey e correção Bonferroni com nível de significância de 0,05. Resultado: As amostras que foram imediatamente seladas com agente adesivo dentinário apresentaram menores gaps marginais do que o selamento dentinário retardado, ambos pré e pós cimentação para todos os subgrupos apresentaram diferença estatística significante (p˂0.01). O gap marginal foi significativamente menor para IDS+Fc (48.888 ±5.5 µm) acompanhado do IDS+Dcrs group (53.612 ±5.8 µm) e IDS+Phc (79.19 9 ±6.9 µm) respectividamente, enquanto o maior gap marginal foi observado no grupo DDS+Phc (86.505 ±5.4 µm). Conclusão:Geralmente, o dente com IDS apresentou melhor adaptação marginal do que o dente sem IDS. O gap marginal foi menor com resina fluida e cimento resinoso dual do que com a resina composta pré-aquecida (AU)


Subject(s)
Cementation , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Resin Cements , Dental Porcelain
3.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 21: e228852, jan.-dez. 2022. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1392917

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the occlusal and internal marginal adaptation of inlay restorations made of different materials, using CAD-CAM. Methods: Preparations were made for MOD inlays of one-third intercuspal width and 4 mm depth in 30 third human molars. The teeth were restored using CAD-CAM materials (n=10) of nanoceramic resin (Lava Ultimate), polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (VITA ENAMIC), or lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD). The specimens were cemented with dual resin cement and sectioned at the center of the restoration, after which the two halves were evaluated, and photographed The occlusal and internal discrepancy (µm) was determined at five points: cavosurface angle of the occlusal-facial wall (CA-O); center of the facial wall (FW); faciopulpal angle (FPA); center of the pulpal wall (PW); and center of the lingual wall (LW). The data were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis and the Dunn tests (α=0.05). Results: No difference was observed among the materials regarding the occlusal discrepancy at the CA-O, FPA, or PW internal points. The e.max CAD measurement at FW showed larger internal discrepancy than that of Lava (p=0.02). The internal discrepancy at LW was greater for e.max CAD than VITA ENAMIC (p=0.02). Conclusion: Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic presented greater internal discrepancy in relation to the surrounding walls of the inlay preparations


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Materials , Inlays
4.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 21: e225136, jan.-dez. 2022. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1354771

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the influence of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) coping fabrication methods and ceramic application on the marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns. Methods: Co-Cr copings for metal-ceramic crowns were prepared by lost wax casting or CAD-CAM machining of sintered blocks. The fit was analyzed using the silicone replica technique at four assessment points: marginal gap (MG), axial wall (AW), axio-occlusal (AO) angle, and central occlusal (CO) wall. After the initial analysis, the copings were ceramic-veneered with the layering technique, and the fit was again determined. Data were statistically analyzed by paired and unpaired Student's-t test (α=0.05). Results: Marginal and internal fit before ceramic application according to the coping manufacturing method showed significant differences only at CO (p < 0.001), with milled copings (137.98±16.71 µm) showing higher gap values than cast copings (112.86±8.57 µm). For cast copings, there were significant differences at MG (before 109.13±8.79 µm; after 102.78±7.18 µm) and CO (before 112.86±8.57 µm; after 104.07±10.63 µm) when comparing the fit before and after ceramic firing. For milled copings, there was significant difference only at AO (before 116.39±9.64 µm; after 108.54±9.26 µm). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the coping fabrication method influenced the internal fit. Ceramic firing maintained or improved the fit of the metal-ceramic crowns. The marginal discrepancy of all restorations, before and after ceramic firing, can be considered clinically acceptable


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Metal Ceramic Alloys , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Crowns
5.
Braz. dent. sci ; 25(3): 1-10, 2022. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1381618

ABSTRACT

The clinical success of tooth-colored indirect restorations has been confirmed in several studies. However, inlays and onlays restorations in Class II cavities with deep gingival margins can still be considered a clinical challenge. With the purpose of facilitating the execution of the operative procedures in intrasulcular margins and reducing the risk of restorative failures, the technique of cervical margin relocation has been explored as a noninvasive alternative to surgical crown lengthening. This work aims at discussing through a case report the biomechanical, operative and biological aspects in the treatment of teeth with deep gingival margins. Therefore, given the therapy applied in the clinical case presented, it is concluded that the cervical margin relocation with composite resin is advantageous since it eliminates the need for surgery, allowing the implementation of indirect restorations in fewer clinical sessions, not causing damage to periodontal tissues once it provided good finishing and polishing with the establishment of a correct emergence profile, allowing flawless maintenance of gingival health after one year. (AU)


Sucesso clínico das restaurações indiretas livres de metal tem sido confirmado em diversos estudos. No entanto, restaurações parciais indiretas em cavidades do tipo classe II com margens profundas ainda podem ser consideradas um desafio clínico. Com a proposta de facilitar a execução dos procedimentos operatórios em margens intra-sulculares e reduzir a ocorrência de falhas, a técnica de elevação da margem gengival em resina composta tem sido explorada como alternativa não invasiva à cirurgia de aumento de coroa clínica. Este trabalho tem a intenção de discutir através de um relato de caso clínico os aspectos biomecânicos, operatórios e biológicos no tratamento de dentes com margens cervicais profundas. Sendo assim, conclui-se que a técnica de elevação da margem gengival com resina composta é vantajosa, pois elimina a necessidade de cirurgia permitindo a execução de restaurações indiretas em menos sessões clínicas, não gerando danos aos tecidos periodontais, desde que haja um bom acabamento e polimento, com estabelecimento de um correto perfil de emergência. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Composite Resins , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Cavity Preparation , Inlays
6.
São José dos Campos; s.n; 2022. 105 p. tab, ilus.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1415240

ABSTRACT

A partir dos avanços da tecnologia CAD/CAM na Odontologia, observa-se a crescente utilização da manufatura aditiva na confecção de peças protéticas. Este trabalho propões a avaliação da acurácia interna e linha de cimentação de endocrowns produzidas através de manufatura aditiva e subtrativa. Para isso foi produzido um modelo mestre preparado para coroa endocrown, o qual foi posteriormente escaneado para desenho e fabricação das restaurações, segundo sua manufatura: aditiva (n=14) e subtrativa (n=14). As endocrowns tiveram sua parte interna escaneadas e através de software de inspeção foram comparadas as diferenças entre o projeto (CAD) e a restauração manufaturada, com a distribuição no interior de cada espécime de 90 pontos de aferição equidistantes. Seus respectivos valores de desvio foram utilizados para o cálculo de um valor eficaz (root mean square - RMS). Além disso, foi mensurada a desadaptação entre as endocrowns e modelo mestre, mediante a técnica da réplica de silicone digital, com aferição da linha de cimentação em pontos padronizados e distribuídos de forma equidistantes na região marginal, axial e pulpar, bem como a mensuração da linha de cimentação absoluta. Os dados da veracidade/acurácia interna passaram por teste de normalidade e comparação estatística pelo teste t student não pareado (α=0,05). Os resultados para veracidade interna RMS (Impresso 49.6032 µm ± 3.8917 e fresado 48.5554µm ± 2.2992) não demonstraram diferença estatística significante entre os grupos (p valor >0.05), entretanto sob avaliação qualitativa em gráfico de cores, houve distorções entre as peças produzidas e o projeto em software CAD, com padrões de distorção distintos segundo o tipo de manufatura. Quanto aos resultados da linha de cimentação, os valores de cada região passaram por teste de normalidade e comparação pelo teste t student não pareado (α=.05). Sem diferença estatística (p valor >0.05) na região marginal (impresso 52.9121 µm ± 10.8946 e fresado 61.8303 µm ± 13.4616) e linha de cimentação absoluta (impresso 84.642µm ± 8.0161 e fresado 89.1016µm ± 10.7006.). Contudo nos resultados da linha de cimentação em região axial (impresso 78.2094µm ± 10.5483 e fresado 95.3686µm ± 9.550), bem como região pulpar (impresso 160.9635µm ± 18.3995 e fresado 131.11µm ± 23.7442), houve diferença estatística significante entre os grupos (p < 0,05). Conclui-se, portanto, com relação aos valores gerais, tais como a linha de cimentação absoluta e veracidade interna, que não houve diferença estatística significante entre as duas manufaturas. Todavia, quanto a avaliações locais da linha de cimentação, o grupo impresso apresentou os melhores resultados em região axial, o grupo fresado em região pulpar e ambos os grupos com resultados semelhantes estatisticamente para região marginal. (AU)


Following the advances in CAD/CAM technology in dentistry and the increasing use of additive manufacturing in prosthetic dentistry, this study proposes the evaluation of the trueness and cementation line adaptation of endocrowns produced through additive and subtractive manufacturing. A master model prepared for endocrown and scanned for design and fabrication of restorations, according to their manufacture type: additive (n=14) and subtractive (n=14). The endocrowns had their internal area scanned and, through an inspection software, the differences between the design (CAD) and the manufactured restoration were compared, based by the distribution in each specimen of 90 equidistant measurement points. And their respective deviation values were used for the calculation of Root Mean Square (RMS). In addition, the misfit between the endocrowns and the master model was measured using the digital silicone replica technique, and the cementation line measured at standardized and equidistant points in marginal, axial, and pulp regions. As well as the measurement of the absolute cementation line. The trueness data underwent a normality test and statistical comparison by the unpaired student t test (α=.05). The results for RMS internal trueness (Printed 49.6032 µm ± 3.8917 and milled 48.5554 µm ± 2.2992) did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (p value >0.05), however under qualitative evaluation in a color map, there are distortions between the crowns produced and the design in CAD software, following different patterns according to the manufacture type. As for the results of the cementation line, the data of each region underwent a normality test and comparison by the unpaired t student test (α=.05). No statistical difference (p value >0.05) in the marginal region (printed 52.9121 µm ± 10.8946 and milled 61.8303 µm ± 13.4616) and absolute cementation line (printed 84.642µm ± 8.0161 and milled 89.1016 µm ± 10.7006.) were observed. However, in the results of the cementation line at the axial region (printed 78.2094µm ± 10.5483 and milled 95.3686µm ± 9.550), as well the pulp region (printed 160.9635µm ± 18.3995 and milled 131.11µm ± 23.7442), there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.05). This study concludes that in relation to the global values, such as the absolute cementation line and internal trueness, that there was no statistically significant difference between the two manufacturing types. However, regarding the local assessments of the cementation line, the printed group presented the best results in the axial region, the milled group in the pulp region, and both groups with statistically similar results for the marginal region. (AU)


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Printing, Three-Dimensional
7.
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 22: e210110, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1422262

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effect of two types of light-curing units (second and third generations) and two types of bulk-fill composite resins with different photoinitiators - Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNCB) and Xtra Fil (XTF) on gap formation at the gingival margins of Cl II restorations. Material and Methods: Fifty-six standard Cl II cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces of premolar teeth, with the gingival margin of the cavities 1 mm apical to the CEJ. The samples were randomly assigned to two groups based on the composite resin type and two subgroups based on the light-curing unit type and restored. After 5000 rounds of thermocycling, gingival margin gap in each sample was measured in µm under an electron microscope at ×2000 magnification. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). Results: Marginal gaps of TNCB composite resin were significantly smaller than those of XTF composite resin (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two light-curing units in each group (p=0.887 with XTF and p=0.999 with TNCB). Conclusion: The gaps at gingival margins of Cl II cavities with TNCB bulk-fill composite were smaller than XTF composite resin. Both composite resins can be cured with both the second- and third-generation LEDs (AU).


Subject(s)
Humans , Bicuspid , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Photoinitiators, Dental/chemistry , In Vitro Techniques/methods , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning/instrumentation , Analysis of Variance
8.
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ; (6): 140-145, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-936125

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the marginal roughness and marginal fitness of chairside computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) laminate veneers with different materials and thicknesses, and to provide a reference for the clinical application of laminate veneers.@*METHODS@#The butt-to-butt type laminate veneers were prepared on resin typodonts, the preparations were scanned, and the laminate veneers were manufactured by chairside CAD/CAM equipment. The laminate veneers were divided into four groups (n=9) according to the materials (glass-matrix ceramics and resin-matrix ceramics) and thickness (0.3 mm and 0.5 mm) of the veneers, with a total of 36. The marginal topo-graphies of each laminate veneer were digitally recorded by stereomicroscope, and the marginal rough-nesses of the laminate veneers were determined by ImageJ software. The marginal fitness of the laminate veneers was measured by a fit checker and digital scanning and measuring method. At the same time, the mechanical properties of glass-matrix ceramic and resin-matrix ceramic bars (n=20) were tested by a universal testing device.@*RESULTS@#The marginal roughness of 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm glass-matrix ceramic laminate veneers was (24.48±5.55) μm and (19.06±5.75) μm, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). The marginal roughness of 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm resin-matrix ceramic laminate veneers was (6.13±1.27) μm and (6.84±2.19) μm, respectively, without a statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The marginal roughness of the glass-matrix ceramic laminate veneers was higher than that of the resin-matrix ceramic laminate veneers with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). The marginal fitness of 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm glass-matrix ceramic laminate veneers were (66.30±26.71) μm and (85.48±30.44) μm, respectively. The marginal fitness of 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm resin-matrix ceramic laminate veneers were (56.42±19.27) μm and (58.36±8.33) μm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference among the 4 groups (P>0.05). For glass-matrix ceramics, the flexural strength was (327.40±54.25) MPa, the flexural modulus was (44.40±4.39) GPa, and the modulus of resilience was (1.24±0.37) MPa. For resin-matrix ceramics, the flexural strength was (173.71±16.61) MPa, the flexural modulus was (11.88±0.51) GPa, and the modulus of resilience was (1.29±0.27) MPa. The flexural strength and modulus of glass-matrix ceramics were significantly higher than those of resin-matrix ceramics (P < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference in the modulus of resilience between the two materials (P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The marginal roughness of CAD/CAM glass-matrix ceramic laminate veneers is greater than that of resin-matrix ceramic laminate veneers, but there was no statistically significant difference in marginal fitness among them. Increasing the thickness can reduce the marginal roughness of glass-matrix ceramic laminate veneers, but has no effect on the marginal roughness of resin-matrix ceramic laminate veneers.


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Porcelain , Dental Veneers , Materials Testing , Surface Properties
9.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 20: e214873, jan.-dez. 2021. ilus
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1254742

ABSTRACT

Aim: To compare the marginal fit of lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns and heat-pressed crowns fabricated using milled wax patterns, and evaluate its effect on stress distribution in implantsupported rehabilitation. Methods: A CAD model of a mandibular first molar was designed, and 16 lithium disilicate crowns (8/group) were obtained. The crown-prosthetic abutment set was evaluated in a scanning electron microscopy. The mean misfit for each group was recorded and evaluated using Student's t-test. For in silico analysis, a virtual cement thickness was designed for the two misfit values found previously, and the CAD model was assembled on an implant-abutment set. A load of 100 N was applied at 30° on the central fossa, and the equivalent stress was calculated for the crown, titanium components, bone, and resin cement layer. Results: The CAD/CAM group presented a significantly (p=0.0068) higher misfit (64.99±18.73 µm) than the heat-pressed group (37.64±15.66 µm). In silico results showed that the heat-pressed group presented a decrease in stress concentration of 61% in the crown and 21% in the cement. In addition, a decrease of 14.5% and an increase of 7.8% in the stress for the prosthetic abutment and implant, respectively, was recorded. For the cortical and cancellous bone, a slight increase in stress occurred with an increase in the cement layer thickness of 5.9% and 5.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The milling of wax patterns for subsequent inclusion and obtaining heat-pressed crowns is an option to obtain restorations with an excellent marginal fit and better stress distribution throughout the implant-abutment set


Subject(s)
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Finite Element Analysis , Dental Materials
10.
Odontol. sanmarquina (Impr.) ; 24(2): 5-11, abr.-jun. 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1178061

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la adaptación marginal de coronas de disilicato de litio obtenidas mediante técnicas de escaneo (CAD/CAM), antes y des- pués de la cristalización, a través de análisis in vitro con microscopía confocal (MC). Métodos. Fueron confeccionadas 16 réplicas en poliuretano a partir de la pieza 1.4, de modelo typodont, tallada para corona total. Las réplicas fueron divididas en dos gru- pos, de acuerdo a la técnica de escaneo: Técnica Indirecta (Grupo IND, n=08), donde modelos de yeso fueron escaneados con escáner de laboratorio (inEos X5, Sirona Den- tal Systems) y Técnica Directa (Grupo DIR, n=08), donde modelos typodont fueron escaneados con escáner intraoral (CEREC BlueCam, Sirona Dental Systems). A seguir, se fresaron (inLab MC XL, Sirona Dental Systems) coronas en disilicato de litio (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) y se adaptaron a las réplicas. Se evaluó la adaptación marginal con análisis de MC en dos momentos, antes y después de la cristalización del disilicato de litio. Los datos fueron analizados con la prueba de Mann-Whitney, t de Student y Wilcoxon (α= 0,05). Resultados. Hubo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la adaptación marginal horizontal entre los grupos IND y DIR después de la cristalización (p=0,05). En el grupo IND, la comparación de la adaptación mar- ginal vertical antes y después de la cristalización mostró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,038). Conclusiones. Las coronas de disilicato de litio obtenidas me- diante escaneo directo (CAD/CAM) presentaron menor desajuste marginal vertical. La etapa de cristalización afectó la adaptación marginal de las coronas.


Objective. This study aimed to evaluate lithium disilicate marginal adaption on crowns by scanning techniques (CAD/CAM), before and after crystallization, through confocal microscopy (CM) in vitro analysis. Methods. Sixteen polyurethane replicas were per- formed from tooth 1.4, of a typodont model, prepared for a full crown. The replicas were divided into two groups, according to the scanning technique: Indirect Technique (Group IND, n=08), where dental stone models were scanned with a laboratory scanner (inEos X5, Sirona Dental Systems) and Direct Technique (Group DIR, n=08), where typodont models were scanned with an intraoral scanner (CEREC BlueCam, Sirona Dental Systems). Then, the lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were milled (inLab MC XL, Sirona Dental Systems) and adapted to the replicas. Margin- al adaptation was evaluated with CM analysis before and after lithium disilicate crystalli- zation. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney, t test, and Wilconxon test (α=0.05). Results. There was a statistically significant difference in horizontal marginal adaptation between IND and DIR groups after crystallization (p=0.05). In IND group, the compar- ison of vertical marginal adaptation before and after crystallization showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.038). Conclusions. Lithium disilicate crowns obtained by direct scanning technique (CAD/CAD) showed less vertical marginal maladjustment. The crystallization stage affected the crown's marginal adaptation.

11.
Braz. dent. sci ; 24(1): 1-8, 2021. tab, ilus
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1145442

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Estudos demostraram que a zircônia monolítica um dos materiais restauradores desenvolvidos recentemente, resolveu vários problemas de restauração de zircônia. Portanto, a precisão marginal e o ajuste interno são necessários para o sucesso clinico e para a qualidade da restauração, e o espaço do cimento pode influenciar o ajuste marginal. Assim, o presente estudo teve como objetivo investigar os efeitos da espessura do cimento e o tipo de restauração na discrepância marginal. Material e métodos: foram usadas para fabricação de coroa total. Dois tipos de materiais incluindo Zirconia monolítica (Zolid) e Sintron foram usadas para produzir a coroa total. As amostras de cada grupo foram digitalizadas em laboratório dentário por um scanner 3D, projetadas e acessadas usando CAD-CAM. As amostras foram divididas em quatro grupos de cinco com espaço de 30 e 50 mícrons de cimento. Para avaliar a discrepância marginal, as coroas foram colocadas em seus respectivos dentes sem o uso de qualquer intermediário e examinados em micro-CT. Os dados foram avaliados pelo software SPSS. Resultados: Descobriu-se que a discrepância marginal do Sintron é maior que a discrepância da zircônia monolítica. Na verdade, a zircônia monolítica com espaço de 50 µm de cimento exibiu uma menor discrepância marginal, e o espaço de cimento do Sintron não influenciou significantemente na discrepância marginal. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que os tipos de material e o espaço do cimento influencia na discrepância marginal da restauração construída pelo fluxo digital (AU)


Objective: Studies demonstrated that as one of then ewly developed restorative materials, monolithic zirconia resolved several issues of zirconia restoration. Therefore, marginal accuracy and internal fit are necessary for clinical success and quality of restorations, and cement space may influence the marginal fit. Thus, the present research aimed to investigate the effects of the cement thickness and kind of restoration on the marginal discrepancy. Material and methods: In this study, 20 maxillary left first molars, prepared by DRSK Co., were used to fabricate a full crown. Two types of material included monolithic zirconia (Zolid) and Sintron were used to make a full crown. Samples from each group were scanned by dental laboratory 3D scanner and designed and processed using CAD-CAM. The samples were divided into four groups of five with 30-and 50- µm cement spaces. In order to assess the vertical marginal discrepancy, the crowns were fittedon their respective teeth without using any mediator and examined by a micro-CT scanner. Data were analyzed by SPSS software. Results: It has been found that marginal discrepancy in Sintron is higher than the discrepancy of monolithic zirconia. In fact, monolithic zirconia with 50-micron cement space exhibited the least marginal discrepancy and the cement space in Sintron did not significantly influence the marginal discrepancy. Conclusion: It has been concluded that the material kinds and cement space influence the restoration marginal discrepancy constructed by digital workflow (AU)


Subject(s)
Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Cements , X-Ray Microtomography
12.
Rev. Ateneo Argent. Odontol ; 64(1): 77-82, 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1252984

ABSTRACT

A pesar de los avances e innovaciones de los materiales dentales, la microfiltración marginal y la contracción durante la polimerización continúan siendo una de las causas principales del fracaso de los tratamientos en odontología restauradora. Un sellado marginal correcto será posible cuando las fuerzas de adhesión superen las fuerzas generadas por la contracción de polimerización y las fuerzas generadas por los cambios dimensionales térmicos posteriores a la polimerización, por lo que investigaciones previas demostraron que estas limitaciones pueden ser superadas con el uso de resinas Bulk Fill como material de relleno de cavidades extensas y profundas de dientes posteriores. Estas resinas. de relleno masivo, están recibiendo atención, principalmente porque se pueden colocar, a diferencia de las resinas convencionales, en incrementos de 4 mm sin afectar la contracción de la polimerización, la adaptación de la cavidad o el grado de conversión. El objetivo de la presente revisión bibliográfica es describir la contracción de polimerización y la consecuente filtración marginal que sufren las resinas compuestas para el sector posterior Bulk Fill con base de datos de la literatura (AU)


Despite advances and innovations in dental materials, marginal microfiltration and shrinkage during polymerization continue to be one of the main causes of treatment failure in Restorative Dentistry. A correct marginal seal will be possible when the adhesion forces exceed the forces generated by polymerization contraction and the forces generated by post-polymerization thermal dimensional changes, for which previous research has shown that these limitations can be overcome with the use of Bulk Fill resins as filling material for large and deep posterior tooth cavities, these massive filling resins are receiving attention mainly because they can be placed, unlike conventional resins, in 4 mm increments without affecting polymerization shrinkage. , cavity adaptation or degree of conversion. The objective of the present bibliographic review is to describe the polymerization contraction and consequent marginal filtration suffered by Composite Resins for the Bulk Fill posterior sector with a literature database (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Composite Resins , Dental Leakage , Polymerization , Materials Testing , Dental Cavity Preparation , Dental Restoration, Permanent/instrumentation
13.
Int. j. odontostomatol. (Print) ; 14(1): 60-66, mar. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1056502

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to evaluate marginal adaptation of Class II mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations before and after thermo-mechanical loading and volumetric shrinkage of the bulk-fill vs conventional composite resin. For marginal adaptation assessment, 24 Class II MOD cavities with cervical margins extending 1.0 mm below (distal) and 1.0 mm beyond (mesial) the cement-enamel junction were prepared in extracted human molars. The teeth were filled as follows: Group A - bulk-fill with SureFil SDR flow (first increment, 4 mm; second increment, 2 mm); Group B - bulk-fill with SureFil SDR flow as a base (first increment, 4 mm) and covered with the conventional nanohybrid composite Esthet-X HD (second increment, 2 mm); and Group C - incrementally filled with Esthet-X HD. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy before and after thermomechanical loading (240,000 loading cycles and simultaneous 600 thermal cycles). To evaluate volumetric polymerization shrinkage, a semi-spherical mold was filled with the tested composites and placed in an AccuVol device after light curing. Both before and after loading, marginal adaptation in cervical dentin was superior (p < 0.05) for Groups A and B compared with Group C. In cervical enamel, Group B showed better marginal adaptation than Group C, and Group A presented intermediary results, between Groups B and C. Furthermore, bulk-fill flow resulted in greater shrinkage than Esthet-X HD. A significant improvement of marginal adaptation was observed when bulkfill flow was used instead of conventional composite resin both before and after thermomechanical loading. However, the bulk-fill flow presented higher volumetric polymerization shrinkage than the conventional composite.


RESUMEN: El objetivo de este trabajo consistió en evaluar la adaptación marginal de las restauraciones mesiales-oclusales-distales (MOD) de Clase II antes y después de la carga termo-mecánica y la contracción volumétrica de la carga compuesta de resina "bulk-fill" en comparación con resina convencional. Para la evaluación de adaptación, se prepararon 24 cavidades MOD de Clase II en molares humanos extraídos, los que se restauraron de la siguiente manera: Grupo A: restaurado con resina fluida Bulk-Fill SureFilSDR (primer incremento, 4 mm; segundo incremento, 2 mm); Grupo B: restaurado con resina fluida Bulk-Fill SureFil SDR (primer incremento, 4 mm) y cubierto con resina compuesta nanohíbrida Esthet-X HD (segundo incremento, 2 mm); y Grupo C - rellenado incrementalmente con Esthet-X HD. La adaptación marginal se evaluó mediante microscopía electrónica de barrido antes y después de la carga termomecánica (240.000 ciclos de carga y 600 ciclos térmicos simultáneos). Para evaluar la contracción volumétrica de la polimerización, se llenó un molde semiesférico con los compuestos probados y se colocó en un dispositivo AccuVol después del fotopolimerización. Tanto antes como después de la carga, la adaptación marginal en la dentina cervical fue superior (p <0,05) para los grupos A y B en comparación con el grupo C. En el esmalte cervical, el grupo B mostró una mejor adaptación marginal que el grupo C, y el grupo A presentó resultados intermedios, entre Grupos B y C. Se observó una mejora significativa de la adaptación marginal al utilizar la resina fluida Bulk-Fill en lugar de resina compuesta convencional tanto antes como después de la carga termomecánica. Sin embargo, la resina fluida 'Bulk-Fill' presentó una mayor contracción volumétrica de polimerización que el compuesto convencional.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Composite Resins , Dental Cavity Preparation/instrumentation , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Stress, Mechanical , Ethics Committees , Dental Restoration Wear , Dental Cavity Preparation/standards , Polymerization
14.
Odontología (Ecuad.) ; 22(1): 66-81, 2020.
Article in Spanish, English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1050508

ABSTRACT

No se han establecido estándares para el tratamiento de cavidades cervicales no cariosas; un biomaterial adecuado permitirá buena adaptación y longevidad de la restauración. Objetivo: Determinar la microfiltración en cavidades clase V no cariosas restauradas con ionómero de vidrio y resina nanoparticulada. Materiales y métodos: Cavidades clase V realizadas en la superficie vestibular de 80 premolares sanos (1,5 mm de pro-fundidad x 3 mm de altura en sentido ocluso- gingival x 2 mm de ancho en sentido mesio-distal) se restauraron aleatoriamente con dos biomateriales (n = 40): 1) ionómero de vidrio y 2) resina de nano relleno. Después, los especímenes fueron aislados con barniz y sumergidos en azul de metileno por 24 horas. Posteriormente, las muestras se sometieron 500 ciclos de termociclado por 8 horas y 45 minutos con cambios térmicos de 37°, 72° y 75°C, cada ciclo con una duración de 17 segundos. Las muestras fueron lavadas con agua destilada y seccionadas longitudinalmente para determinar el grado de microfiltración utilizando un estereoscopio (Leica M60, Biosystems). Los datos categóricos se analizaron con el test Chi2 en SPSS 24®. Resultados: Se pudo apreciar que la filtración es significativamente menor en resina que con ionómeros de vidrio (p < 0,001). Sin embargo, ninguno de los materiales de restauración probados fue capaz de sellar los márgenes o las paredes de los dientes completamente. Conclusión: como resultado del presente experimento se determina que las restauraciones de clase V obturadas con resina de nano relleno presentan menor microfiltración marginal que las restauradas con ionómero de vidrio.


No standards have been established for the treatment of non-carious cervical cavities; a suitable biomaterial will allow good adaptation and longevity of the restoration. Objective: To determine microfiltration in non-car-ious class V cavities restored with glass ionomer and nanoparticulate resin. Materials and methods: Class V cavities made on the vestibular surface of 80 healthy premolars (1.5 mm deep x 3 mm high in the occlusion-gin-gival direction x 2 mm wide in the mesio-distal direction) were randomly restored with two biomaterials (n = 40): 1) glass ionomer and 2) nano-filled resin. Then, the specimens were isolated with varnish and immersed in methylene blue for 24 hours. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling for 8 hours and 45 minutes with thermal changes of 37°, 72° and 75° C, each cycle with a duration of 17 seconds. The samples were washed with distilled water and sectioned longitudinally to determine the degree of micro-filtration using a stereoscope (Leica M60 Biosystems). Categorical data were analyzed with the Chi2 test in SPSS 24®. Results: It was observed that filtration is significantly lower in resin than in those restored with glass ionomers (p < 0.001). However, none of the restoration materials tested were able to seal the margins or walls of the teeth completely. Conclusion: As a result of the present experiment, it is determined that class V resto-rations sealed with nano-filled resin have less marginal microfiltration than those restored with glass ionomer.


Ainda não foram estabelecidos padrões para o tratamento de cavidades cervicais não cariosas; um biomate-rial adequado permitirá boa adaptação e longevidade da restauração. Objetivo: Determinar a microfiltração em cavidades não cariosas da classe V restauradas com ionômero de vidro e resina nanoparticulada. Materi-ais e métodos: Cavidades de classe V feitas na superfície vestibular de 80 pré-molares saudáveis (1,5 mm de profundidade x 3 mm de altura na direção oclusão-gengival x 2 mm de largura na direção mesio-distal) foram restaurados aleatoriamente com dois biomateriais (n = 40): 1) ionômero de vidro e 2) resina nano-híbrida. Em seguida, as amostras foram isoladas com verniz e imersas em azul de metileno por 24 horas. Posteriormente, as amostras foram submetidas a 500 ciclos de termociclagem por 8 horas e 45 minutos com alterações tér-micas de 37°, 72° e 75° C, cada ciclo com duração de 17 segundos. As amostras foram lavadas com água destilada e seccionadas longitudinalmente para determinar o grau de microfiltração usando um estereoscópio (Leica M60, Biosystems). Os dados categóricos foram analisados com o teste Chi2 no SPSS 24®. Resul-tados: Observou-se que a filtração é significativamente menor na resina do que nos ionômeros de vidro (p <0,001). No entanto, nenhum dos materiais de restauração testados foram capazes de selar completamente as margens ou paredes dos dentes. Conclusão: como resultado do presente experimento, determina-se que restaurações de classe V seladas com resina nano-preenchida possuem menos microfiltração marginal do que aquelas restauradas com ionômero de vidro.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Cavity Lining , Dental Leakage , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Cementum
15.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 19: e200537, jan.-dez. 2020. ilus
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1152077

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite resin crowns fabricated with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology using an intraoral digital scanner. Methods: A human mandibular right second molar was prepared for a ceramic crown. The impressions were made using intraoral scanning device and crowns were milled. Tem crowns were fabricated for each group (n=10): GF ­ Feldspathic Ceramic (Cerec Blocs, Sirona), GL - Lithium Disilicate Ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar), GG - composite resin (Grandio Blocs, VOCO) and GB - composite resin (Brava Block, FGM). The marginal gap was measured for each specimen at 4 points under magnification with a stereomicroscope. All data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test (α=.05). Results: The lowest marginal discrepancy value was observed in GB (60.95 ± 13.64 µm), which was statistically different from the GL (84.22 ± 20.86 µm). However, there was no statistically significant difference between these groups when compared with the other groups, GF (73.26 ±8.19 µm) and GG (68.42 ± 11.31 µm). Conclusion: It can be concluded that the composite resin presented the lowest variance compared to the lithium disilicate glass ceramic, although the marginal gap of all materials tested was within the acceptable clinical limit (120 µm)


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Composite Resins , Crowns
16.
Rev. estomatol. Hered ; 29(4): 253-266, oct.-dic 2019. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1144584

ABSTRACT

Las nuevas tecnologías digitalizadas han permitido migrar de la técnica de cera perdida colada por centrifugación (CPC) a la fabricación sustractiva por CAD/CAM como la técnica de fresado de bloque blando (SMB). Objetivo: El propósito de este estudio fue comparar las adaptaciones marginales e internas en cofias metálicas de Co-Cr sobre dos líneas de terminación: chamfer y bisel confeccionadas mediante dos técnicas: CPC y SMB. Material y Métodos: Se confeccionaron dos modelos maestros de Co-Cr con terminación chamfer y bisel, se formaron 4 grupos de estudio y se fabricaron 13 cofias por grupo. Para la evaluación de las adaptaciones marginal e interna se usó el método de la réplica en silicona, luego con un estéreo microscopio se evaluó las discrepancias marginales e internas. Resultados: Para la discrepancia marginal entre las dos técnicas, para la terminación bisel sólo se observó diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p<0,05) en los puntos A1 y A2 y en la terminación chamfer se observó diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p<0,05) en los puntos A1 y F1. En la adaptación interna comparando ambas técnicas en la terminación bisel se obtuvo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p<0,05) en los puntos E1, E2, D1, C2 y D2. En la terminación chamfer los resultados mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p<0,05) en todos los puntos. Conclusiones: Las cofias que presentaron mejor adaptación marginal fueron las confeccionadas por SMB con la línea de terminación chamfer, en la línea de terminación bisel no se pudo concluir cuál de las dos técnicas es mejor en adaptación marginal. Las que presentaron mejor adaptación interna en ambas líneas de terminación, en la zona axial fueron las cofias realizadas mediante la técnica CPC y en la zona oclusal presentaron mejor adaptación interna el SMB.


The new digitized technologies have allowed to migrate from the technique of lost cast wax by centrifugation (CPC) to the subtractive manufacturing by CAD / CAM as the technique of soft-block milling (SMB). Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal adaptations in metal Co-Cr copes on two termination lines: chamfer and bevel made by two techniques: CPC and SMB. Material and Methods: Two Co-Cr master models with chamfer and bevel termination were made, 4 study groups were formed and 13 copings were made per group. For the evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptations the replication method was used in silicone, then with a stereomicroscope the marginal and internal discrepancies were evaluated. Results: For the marginal discrepancy between the two techniques, only statistically significant differences were observed for the bevel termination (p <0.05) in points A1 and A2 and in the chamfer termination statistically significant differences were observed (p <0.05) in points A1 and F1. In the internal adaptation comparing both techniques in the bevel termination, statistically significant differences were obtained (p <0.05) in points E1, E2, D1, C2 y D2. And in the chamfer termination, the results showed statistically significant differences (p <0.05) in all the points. Conclusions: The copes that presented better marginal adaptation were those made by SMB with the chamfer termination line, in the bevel termination line it was not possible to conclude which of the two techniques is better in marginal adaptation. The ones that presented better internal adaptation in both lines of termination, in the axial zone were the copings made using the CPC technique and in the occlusal area the SMB had better internal adaptation.

17.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-192317

ABSTRACT

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the behavior of a resin-based 2,2-bis (p-[2′-hydroxy-3′-methacryloxypropoxy] phenylene) propane and a composite resin modified with oxirane, regarding the ability of marginal sealing, both with direct restorations and indirect restorations. Materials and Methods: To achieve this, mesio- and disto-occlusal cavities were made on the same tooth, totalling 100 cavities. These cavities were restored with two materials, Filtek P90 (3M ESPE) and Opallis (FGM). Then, they were divided into two groups: Fifty direct restorations, each sample restored with the two materials, following the manufacturer's protocol and fifty indirect restorations, and then cemented with a paste obtained by diluting the resin in its adhesive. The templates were thermally cycled, 30 s at 5°C and 30 s at 55°C for 500 cycles and then were immersed in methylene blue for 24 h. Afterward, they were trimmed using a plaster trimmer from occlusal toward a gingival direction. These samples were analyzed with stereomicroscope (×3) by two blinded observers. Then, a system which considers the average number of surrounding walls that have suffered infiltration on a scale of 0–3 was used. Results: Data were subjected to statistical analysis (Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests) with a significance level of 5% maximum. Conclusion: It was concluded that the indirect restorations showed the greatest number of restorations with score 0 and 1 (34) and lowest score 2 and 3 (16). This suggests that indirect restorations regardless of the material used behaved more effectively regarding the marginal sealing of restorations.

18.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 18: e191603, jan.-dez. 2019. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1095171

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divided into four groups: Irreversible hydrocolloid(IH), laboratory silicone (LS), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS). After the impression procedures, each matrix was loaded with the provisional prosthetic materials, Alike, Duralay, Protemp 4, and Structur 3 (n = 12). Marginal discrepancy was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×45 magnification. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program, and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines at the metal die were measured vertically. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=.05). Results: the acrylic resins had higher values ​​of marginal discrepancy compared to the bisacrylic resins. A statistically significant difference was found between all impression materials, and the irreversible hydrocolloid presented higher values of discrepancy (303.28­613.31 µm), whereas addition silicone had the lowest (48.61­190.06 µm). Conclusions: the bisacrylic resins had a better marginal adaptation compared to the acrylic resins. The addition silicone promoted a better marginal adaptation of the provisional prosthetic materials tested, followed by condensation silicone, laboratory silicone, and irreversible hydrocolloid


Subject(s)
Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Impression Materials , Dental Restoration, Temporary
19.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 18: e191404, jan.-dez. 2019. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1087496

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the marginal accuracy of provisional crowns made with acrylics resins and to identify the surface(s) with the highest marginal discrepancy. Methods: A direct technique was used to fabricate 96 provisional restorations with 8 materials: Dencrilay, Dencôrlay, Dencôr, Vipicor, Duralay, Resinlay Speed, Refine Bright and Alike (n=12). The provisional crowns were made on a prepared molar-shaped metal die with a vinyl polysiloxane impression as a matrix. Marginal discrepancy of provisional restorations was analyzed at buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces of metal die finish line in a stereomicroscope lupe at 100X. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines were measured vertically. Comparisons were made with 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (p <0.05). Results: The Alike resin exhibited the lowest marginal discrepancy (0.018 mm) and was significantly different from the Dencôrlay (0.037 mm), Filter Bright (0.034 mm), Duralay (0.033 mm) and Vipicor (0.032) resins. The buccal surface showed the highest marginal discrepancy (0.040 mm) compared to those of other surfaces (distal 0.029mm, lingual 0.028mm and mesial 0.024mm). Conclusion: The marginal adaptation of all materials and surfaces tested in this study were within a clinical acceptable limit. The Alike resin showed the best performance compared to Dencôrlay, Refine Bright, Duralay, and Vipicor resins. The buccal surface showed the highest marginal discrepancy than those of the other tested surfaces


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Restoration, Temporary
20.
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics ; : 211-218, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-761438

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy of four different metal copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology and to evaluate clinical effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Composite resin tooth of the maxillary central incisor was prepared for a metal ceramic crown and duplicated metal die was fabricated. Then scan the metal die for 12 times to obtain STL files using a confocal microscopy type oral scanner. Metal copings with a thickness of 0.5 mm and a cement space of 50 µm were designed on a CAD program. The Co-Cr metal copings were fabricated by the following four methods: Wax pattern milling & Casting (WM), Resin pattern 3D Printing & casting (RP), Milling & Sintering (MS), Selective laser melting (SLM). Silicone replica technique was used to measure marginal and internal discrepancies. The data was statistically analyzed with One-way analysis of variance and appropriate post hoc test (Scheffe test) (α=.05). RESULTS: Mean marginal discrepancy was significantly smaller in the Group WM (27.66 ± 9.85 µm) and Group MS (28.88 ± 10.13 µm) than in the Group RP (38.09 ± 11.14 µm). Mean cervical discrepancy was significantly smaller in the Group MS than in the Group RP. Mean axial discrepancy was significantly smaller in the Group WM and Group MS then in the Group RP and Group SLM. Mean incisal discrepancies was significantly smaller in the Group RP than in all other groups. CONCLUSION: The marginal and axial discrepancies of the Co-Cr coping fabricated by the Wax pattern milling and Milling/Sintering method were better than those of the other groups. The marginal, cervical and axial fit of Co-Cr copings in all groups are within a clinically acceptable range.


Subject(s)
Ceramics , Crowns , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Freezing , Incisor , Methods , Microscopy, Confocal , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Replica Techniques , Silicon , Silicones , Tooth , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL